Rogue Yeast?

Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:47 pm

Any tips on what yeast to use for a Rogue clone (short of pinching some from the bottom of a bottle). I dont seem to be able to get the Pacman yeast in Australia.
dags
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:09 pm

Re: Rogue Yeast?

Thu Jan 22, 2009 7:54 pm

Go ahead and use White Labs 001 or Wyeast 1056 and mash a couple degrees degrees cooler. Pacman is pretty much the same clean fermenting yeast strain with the major difference being that it tends to attenuate a bit further.

If you can get any Rogue beers, you can also culture the yeast from the bottle as those beers are not pasteurized.

Wayne
Bugeater Brewing Company
http://www.lincolnlagers.com
User avatar
Bugeater
 
Posts: 5789
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 9:19 pm
Location: River City

Re: Rogue Yeast?

Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:38 pm

Thanks Bugeater, but I heard John Meier (I know thats spelt wrong) on the Session - he mentioned it being a bit English in styls I thought?
dags
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:09 pm

Re: Rogue Yeast?

Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:48 pm

dags wrote:Any tips on what yeast to use for a Rogue clone (short of pinching some from the bottom of a bottle). I dont seem to be able to get the Pacman yeast in Australia.



I know you cant get this shipped down under, but just posting this in case anyone else needs the Pacman yeast
http://www.rebelbrewer.com/shoppingcart ... Rogue.html
http://www.embracethefunk.com <----My Sour Beer Website

PRIVATE FIRST CLASS- The BN Army: Dirty South Squadron
Proud 2010 Fallen Soldier Winner
Proud 2009 Caller of the Year Nominee
Image

POLLO ASADO!
Brandon
 
Posts: 1195
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:16 pm
Location: Nashville, TN

Re: Rogue Yeast?

Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:54 pm

Cheers Brandon sounds like the 1056 is the go
dags
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:09 pm

Re: Rogue Yeast?

Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:58 am

I don't find pacman to be any more attenuative than 1056/001. Rogue's drier beers have about 78% AA and most people who use 1056/001 know that it will do about the same with a reasonably fermentable wort.

The dramatic difference, IMO, is in flocculation. If you bottle condition or would prefer a slightly cleaner beer that might be a reason to use pacman instead of 1056/001.

It does seem to tolerate colder temperatures better, that may or may not be an advantage. Maybe if you are fermenting uncontrolled in your basement you use Pacman in the winter and 1056 in the summer.

I know John Maier believes it that it favors maltiness a bit and helps him make balanced beers with a lot of hops. I'm not sure I have noticed a dramatic difference in flavor profile but I haven't done a lot of side by side testing.
remilard
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:59 pm

Return to Fermentation

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

A BIT ABOUT US

The Brewing Network is a multimedia resource for brewers and beer lovers. Since 2005, we have been the leader in craft beer entertainment and information with live beer radio, podcasts, video, events and more.