TastyMcD wrote:thatguy314 wrote:Similarly I think one could similarly do a good black IPA by using more english style earthy / floral hops. I tend to prefer these hops more in roasty beers to begin with. EKG, Fuggle, Nugget, maybe northern brewer? Janet's brown blends the northern brewer and the roasted malt very well IMO. So do many other beers. They don't have to clash if you choose the right hops.
I agree. Citrus hops don't work well with the roast of Black IPA nor the phenolics of a Belgian yeast. And that's really my problem with both these styles. Is that really as creative as we can be? Adding Carafa Special or Belgian yeast and using the same hops you normally use in the house IPA and calling that a new style? Do homebrewers have to all the fucking work! Just kidding there.
I brewed a Black IPA on Sunday with Northern Brewer hops. If I don't like that one, then I'm giving up completely.
BTW, that Bells 10000 is like 9.5% or more. That's way bigger than an IPA. Regular or fucked up with Carafa.
Tasty
I think the bigger bitterness or hoppyness can clash with yeast phenols, or dark roasty malts, but they don't necessarily have to, and if you have tried enough commercial examples, you almost have to have tried great examples of both Black IPA's and Belgian IPA's. (Also, I would think that it is more the actual IBU level of a beer that clashes with yeast phenols than the type of hop. Phenols to me stand in for bitterness on beers like hefeweizen and trapppist style beers.)
For Belgian strains and phenol producing strains that do great things with hops: a few of my personal favorites are Lagunitas Little Sumpin' Wild, De Ranke XX Bitter, New Glarus Crack'd Wheat, and Captain Lawrence Xtra Gold, one of the beers you guys did on CYBI and Jamil praised so highly. Certainly an intense bitterness can clash with the yeast-driven phenols, but can't this be pulled off well by balancing all the flavor aspects of bitterness, hop aroma, and yeast flavors and aroma? Can't the same thing be said for Black IPA's/CDA's? I have had some great examples here in Portland, such as CDA's from Hopworks, Deschutes, Widmer, and many others. They didn't become the beer trend of the year because they taste bad!!! I just brewed a dry stout with Cascade and Chinook hops that I think tastes great and could easily be called a "Black APA", but it tastes great whatever it is. Every beer that works well is a balancing act. I refuse to believe that you can't make a good hoppy belgian ale or hoppy black IPA, or that it is somehow intrisically impossible to make these flavors work together. But Tasty, I commend you for trying to brew a style that you aren't really a fan of to see if you can get a beer that you really like to drink.
I think it's fine for someone to say that a style of beer does not do much for them. I'm not a usually a huge fan of Scottish wee heavys, American "red" ales, or Irish red ales. I can drink them but they just don't do a lot for me usually. But, I think we have to be careful not to write off some legitimate beer "styles" or call them uncreative. With all the great stuff going on in homebrewing and pro brewing these days, I would like to see us all get to a point where we are brewing what we like, both to-style beers and freestyle beers, and drinking what we like, not based on how creative it is but how much we enjoy it.
EDIT: As to the original question that got this debate started, the only way you can't go wrong is to brew both!






